Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COPY BINARY broken on Linux/AXP

From: Reinhard Max <max(at)suse(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY broken on Linux/AXP
Date: 2001-06-29 08:24:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Reinhard Max <max(at)suse(dot)de> writes:
> > I suspect that the newer versions of gcc or glibc are the source of
> > these problems. Let's see what our Alpha experts say about this...
> Okay.  If it proves to be a portability problem rather than a
> compiler bug, let us know ...

... it really was the compiler. Sorry for bothering you.

What will remain is the differences in the results of the geometry
test. This is due to the fact that glibc-2.2.3 uses a different (and
more precise, as I've been told) implementation for the trigonometric

Is there a way to reflect that fact in /src/test/regress/resultmap so
that the results of both glibc<2.2.3 and glibc>=2.2.3 get compared
with thir respective expected results?


In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-29 14:20:40
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY broken on Linux/AXP
Previous:From: 鍾子帆Date: 2001-06-29 07:44:37
Subject: setup postgresql problems ???

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group