| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Date: | 2002-04-16 03:34:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204152332040.834-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> The following patch adds --maxindfuncparams to configure to allow you to
> more easily set the maximum number of function parameters and columns
> in an index. (Can someone come up with a better name?)
> Are we staying at 16 as the default? I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty,
If you want to increase it, let's just increase it and not add any more
configure options. If someone wants more than 32 then we really need to
start talking about design issues.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-16 03:35:57 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-04-16 03:34:04 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-16 03:35:57 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-04-16 03:34:04 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-16 03:35:57 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-04-16 03:34:04 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |