From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Lindner <lindner(at)visionet(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL 7.2.1 and Sun's C compiler under Solaris8 |
Date: | 2002-04-15 18:38:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204151436310.834-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc pgsql-patches |
I think we should get rid of the _init and _fini functions altogether,
because Solaris is not the only platform where this is a problem.
Evidently, there are already workarounds in place in case they don't work,
so it shouldn't be a problem to remove them. Let's see what the ODBC guys
say.
Stefan Lindner writes:
> Hi,
>
> PostgreSQL works well with this combination but with one modification:
>
> It will not compile with SunC Version 5.3 (no experience with other
> versions) unless
> you make the following change in file psqlodbc.c: remove the functions
> "_init" and "_fini". The crt.o library of Sun's C compiler contains this
> functions.
> This could be done by adding lines like
>
> #if !defined (__SUNPRO_C)
> ...
> #endif
>
> The attachement is a modified version of psqlodbc according to this
> suggestion
>
>
> Stefan Lindner
> ---
> Visionet GmbH, Am Weichselgarten 7, 91058 Erlangen
> Tel.: 09131/691230, FAX:09131/691111
> mailto:lindner(at)visionet(dot)de, http://www.visionet.de
>
> Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
> tried it. (Donald E. Knuth)
>
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-04-16 10:28:27 | Re: unexpected protocol charactor during authentication |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-04-15 13:54:46 | psqlODBC 07.02.0001 (Win32) Released |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-15 19:18:10 | Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-15 18:24:51 | Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour! |