Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Date: 2002-03-26 05:23:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203260021240.736-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand
> > the latter seems correct ...
>
> I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated,
> it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2.

But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-03-26 05:30:16 Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-26 05:20:41 Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...