Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Date: 2002-03-26 05:23:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203260021240.736-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2?  Right offhand
> > the latter seems correct ...
> I wasn't sure what to do here.  I figured if the docs were regenerated,
> it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2.

But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-03-26 05:30:16
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-26 05:20:41
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group