Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: gabriel <gabriel(at)workingnetsp(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INDEX BUG???
Date: 2001-09-03 17:57:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0109031957010.4304-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
gabriel writes:

> So my question is why in the first case the postgre did'nt use the index
> and made a seq scan ??

Because it thinks the sequential scan will be faster.  You didn't show any
evidence to the contrary.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-03 18:22:03
Subject: Re: cannot detect too many clients
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2001-09-03 17:43:06
Subject: Re: INDEX BUG???

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group