Re: INDEX BUG???

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: gabriel <gabriel(at)workingnetsp(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INDEX BUG???
Date: 2001-09-03 17:57:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0109031957010.4304-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

gabriel writes:

> So my question is why in the first case the postgre did'nt use the index
> and made a seq scan ??

Because it thinks the sequential scan will be faster. You didn't show any
evidence to the contrary.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-09-03 18:22:03 Re: cannot detect too many clients
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-09-03 17:43:06 Re: INDEX BUG???