| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proceeding with gettext |
| Date: | 2001-06-02 14:47:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106021641230.763-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Are you planning to tackle any of the other elog-related stuff that's
> been discussed in the past? (Automatic file/linenumber information,
> relabeling the set of severity codes, that sort of thing?)
Planning... I don't think I'm interested in the file/line information,
given the cruftyness it would require. I can find that information with
find | xargs grep just fine. Error codes are high on my agenda, but the
specification still needs to be finalized.
> Sooner or later we're going to have to bite the bullet and edit every
> elog instance in the system.
I don't think I want to do that.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-02 14:49:11 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| Previous Message | Kovacs Zoltan | 2001-06-02 11:59:00 | Re: ERROR: cache lookup for proc 43030134 failed |