Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proceeding with gettext

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proceeding with gettext
Date: 2001-05-30 17:04:00
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105301847440.757-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >> Peter, can you give a little sample of how an elog() call would look in
> >> the new system?  Thanks.
> > No change.
> Wouldn't there need to be changes in the %-escape usage in elog message
> strings?

No, for the programmer nothing changes.

Are you referring to the possibility that the parameters need to appear in
a different order in the translated message?  This can be handled if the
translator uses the %1$s style place holder in the translated string.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ian Lance TaylorDate: 2001-05-30 17:06:06
Subject: Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-30 16:32:33
Subject: Re: Proceeding with gettext

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group