Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unused pg_class columns

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unused pg_class columns
Date: 2001-05-30 15:39:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105301738460.757-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I removed the reference in pgaccess.  After a few releases of pgaccess
> > we can remove the column.
> Put it back please.  Or have you become the unilateral arbiter of what
> functions pgaccess has?

If pgaccess only reads the column and the backend doesn't use it, it seems
reasonable to remove the reference.  It looks like it was a mistake to
begin with.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-05-30 15:42:24
Subject: Re: Unused pg_class columns
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-30 15:37:02
Subject: Re: Unused pg_class columns

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group