Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: An interesting document? May be in non-traditional

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: An interesting document? May be in non-traditional
Date: 2003-05-19 22:18:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
On Sun, 18 May 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:

> Hi guys,
> Look at
> Bumped into this while reading /. thread of rjava performance. Frankly I don't 
> know where to start and where to put an answer.

Hmm. It is one of the more reasonable appraisals I've seen of the two
databases. I'm just wondering how the author concluded that MySQL was a
little better than PostgreSQL when he was so critical of the backup,
replication and DDL implementations under MySQL. I would have thought they
would be real show stoppers.


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-05-19 23:05:30
Subject: Re: .org domain went down.
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2003-05-19 15:48:10
Subject: .org domain went down.

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-05-19 22:28:40
Subject: Re: disk space usage enlarging despite vacuuming
Previous:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-05-19 22:17:24
Subject: Re: pg_atoi problem with 7.3.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group