Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: postgresql documentation iimprovements

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql documentation iimprovements
Date: 2002-12-19 01:34:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Scott Lamb wrote:

> Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> >>2. IMHO, The documentation for create rule is not clear and detailed
> >>enough. has a very nice tutorial about this command and
> >>how it could be used in a production database.  It is very important for
> >>usage of this command to be clear, because only postgres has it, and
> > 
> > FWIW Oracle and other databases have rules.
> This didn't sound right, so I just checked. The Oracle docs do not 
> mention "create rule". Google says Microsoft Transact SQL has a "create 
> rule", but it's not at all the same: a really, really old syntax for 
> check constraints or something. Only still there for backwards 
> compatibility.

Hah. You're right. Its been a long year...


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2002-12-19 02:06:54
Subject: Update on PostgreSQL Weekly News
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2002-12-18 19:12:26
Subject: Re: Media Kit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group