Re: More ?

From: harrold(at)sage(dot)che(dot)pitt(dot)edu
To: Peter K <dooh(at)get2net(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More ?
Date: 2001-09-14 21:32:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0109141728281.31176-100000@sage.che.pitt.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Sometime in September Peter K assaulted keyboard and produced...

|Is it true that PostgreSQL favour features for speed?
in short yes. inorder to be a robust rmdbs you are required to have
certain features eg. transactions that tend to incure a loss in
speed. this is one reason why mysql is _considered_ faster for some
applications. it is up to the developer to determine if they are
interested in features _or_ speed. you have to weigh your options and
determine what is best for your project.

this is what i have read. others should feel free to add or subtract from
this.

|Which platforms/servers does PostgreSQL support?
http://www.us.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#1.3
http://www.us.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#1.4

|What kind of script language works well with PostgreSQL?
http://www.us.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#2.4

--
john
kitten the other white meat.

In response to

  • More ? at 2001-09-12 21:53:09 from Peter K

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark G. Franz 2001-09-14 22:56:50 Re: More ?
Previous Message Noah Roberts 2001-09-14 17:27:13 no attribute tuple 1259 -2