From: | harrold(at)sage(dot)che(dot)pitt(dot)edu |
---|---|
To: | Peter K <dooh(at)get2net(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More ? |
Date: | 2001-09-14 21:32:35 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0109141728281.31176-100000@sage.che.pitt.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Sometime in September Peter K assaulted keyboard and produced...
|Is it true that PostgreSQL favour features for speed?
in short yes. inorder to be a robust rmdbs you are required to have
certain features eg. transactions that tend to incure a loss in
speed. this is one reason why mysql is _considered_ faster for some
applications. it is up to the developer to determine if they are
interested in features _or_ speed. you have to weigh your options and
determine what is best for your project.
this is what i have read. others should feel free to add or subtract from
this.
|Which platforms/servers does PostgreSQL support?
http://www.us.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#1.3
http://www.us.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#1.4
|What kind of script language works well with PostgreSQL?
http://www.us.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#2.4
--
john
kitten the other white meat.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark G. Franz | 2001-09-14 22:56:50 | Re: More ? |
Previous Message | Noah Roberts | 2001-09-14 17:27:13 | no attribute tuple 1259 -2 |