Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PAM Authentication Patch, take one...

From: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PAM Authentication Patch, take one...
Date: 2001-09-01 00:54:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> pam_strerror() should be used a few more times, rather than just saying
> "Error!".  Also, the snippet seems wrong.  You add
> -I$pam_prefix/include/security to $INCLUDES and then you #include
> <security/pam_appl.h>.  This whole thing is probably unnecessary, since
> PAM is a system library on the systems where it exists, so the headers
> and libraries are found automatically, unlike OpenSSL and
> Kerberos.

See attached revised patch. (I'm sure the stuff can be done
right/better, I'm just not enough of a autoconf guru to know what to
change it to.)

Dominic J. Eidson
                                        "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli

Attachment: pgsql-diff.log
Description: text/plain (13.9 KB)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-09-01 01:16:05
Subject: Re: INTERVAL type: SQL92 implementation
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2001-08-31 19:00:27
Subject: Re: Read transactions don't work on 7.0.x db's

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group