Re: Constraint names using 'user namespace'?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Constraint names using 'user namespace'?
Date: 2000-11-27 23:33:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011280031590.832-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner writes:

> pjw=# create table pk1(f1 integer, constraint zzz primary key(f1));
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'zzz' for
> table 'pk1'
> CREATE
> pjw=# create table zzz(f1 integer);
> ERROR: Relation 'zzz' already exists
>
> Is there a good reason why the automatically created items do not have a
> 'pg_' in front of their names?

One thing that has always bugged me is why indexes have names at all. I
can never think of any. The table name and the attribute
name(s)/number(s) should suffice.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message selkovjr 2000-11-28 00:03:33 Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-27 23:30:09 Ancient lock bug figured out