Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris
Date: 2000-07-02 15:22:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0007021717440.351-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
pgsql-hackers(at)thewrittenword(dot)com writes:

> 3. Why is NAN defined in src/include/solaris_i386.h as:
> #define                            NAN     (*(__const double *) __nan)
> #endif   /* GCC.  */
> if the compiler is not GCC? The Solaris C compiler does not like this.
> I removed it and the compilation succeeded.

We never cleared out this item. What is the proper way to generate a `NaN'
on your compiler? Does `0.0/0.0' work?

Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala            Sweden

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-07-02 16:47:55
Subject: Re: vacuumdb problem
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-07-02 15:22:43
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group