From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Yutaka tanida <yutaka(at)marin(dot)or(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] .exe extension on Windows |
Date: | 2000-06-27 00:42:52 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0006270239260.9749-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Hiroshi Inoue writes:
> Hmm,I see the following in my environment.
>
> bash-2.02$ ls
> CVS Makefile pg_passwd.c pg_passwd.o
> bash-2.02$ make pg_passwd
> gcc -o pg_passwd
> pg_passwd.o -lcrypt -lm -lreadline -ltermcap -lncurses -lcygipc
> -g
> bash-2.02$ ls
> CVS Makefile pg_passwd.c pg_passwd.exe pg_passwd.o
> bash-2.02$ make pg_passwd
> make: `pg_passwd' is up to date.
Seems make is smarter than it wants to admit. Then that would not sit well
with the changes I just made (which would require you to do `make
pg_passwd.exe', unless make is *that* smart). Gotta investigate this in
the GNU make manuals. Thanks.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-27 00:44:19 | Is *that* why debugging backend startup is so hard!? |
Previous Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 2000-06-27 00:36:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-27 18:08:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |
Previous Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 2000-06-27 00:36:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |