Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-04-09 18:33:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0004091713200.375-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Why is someone (presumably from southern California) always changing all
mentions of "PostgreSQL" in the documentation to "Postgres"? Wouldn't it
be more productive the other way around?

Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala            Sweden


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-04-09 18:34:09
Subject: Re: Open documentation items for 7.0
Previous:From: Bernard FrankpittDate: 2000-04-08 22:20:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Doc updates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group