Re: Call for porting reports

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for porting reports
Date: 2000-04-02 21:18:55
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0004021805380.373-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart writes:

> I'd like to collect info on the platforms we are supporting for v7.0.

I am now reproduceably getting this failure in the timestamp test. I have
never seen it before today:

*** expected/timestamp.out Sun Apr 2 14:15:29 2000
--- results/timestamp.out Sun Apr 2 18:01:21 2000
***************
*** 13,25 ****
SELECT (timestamp 'today' = (timestamp 'tomorrow' - interval '1 day')) as "True";
True
------
! t
(1 row)

SELECT (timestamp 'tomorrow' = (timestamp 'yesterday' + interval '2 days')) as "True";
True
------
! t
(1 row)

SELECT (timestamp 'current' = 'now') as "True";
--- 13,25 ----
SELECT (timestamp 'today' = (timestamp 'tomorrow' - interval '1 day')) as "True";
True
------
! f
(1 row)

SELECT (timestamp 'tomorrow' = (timestamp 'yesterday' + interval '2 days')) as "True";
True
------
! f
(1 row)

SELECT (timestamp 'current' = 'now') as "True";
***************
*** 81,87 ****
SELECT count(*) AS one FROM TIMESTAMP_TBL WHERE d1 = timestamp 'today' + interval '1 day';
one
-----
! 1
(1 row)

SELECT count(*) AS one FROM TIMESTAMP_TBL WHERE d1 = timestamp 'today' - interval '1 day';
--- 81,87 ----
SELECT count(*) AS one FROM TIMESTAMP_TBL WHERE d1 = timestamp 'today' + interval '1 day';
one
-----
! 0
(1 row)

SELECT count(*) AS one FROM TIMESTAMP_TBL WHERE d1 = timestamp 'today' - interval '1 day';

----------------------

The catch is that this *always* happens in the (parallel) regression tests
but not if I run the file through psql by hand. Gives me a warm feeling
... :(

Furthermore, PostgreSQL doesn't compile with gcc 2.8.1 (never has). I get
a fatal signal if backend/utils/adt/float.c is compiled with -O2 or
higher. The offending line is in function

float64 dpow(float64 arg1, float64 arg2)

*result = (float64data) pow(tmp1, tmp2);

Certainly a compiler bug, does anyone have a suggestion how this should be
handled? Is gcc 2.8.1 in wide-spread use?

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-04-02 21:33:12 Re: Docs refreshed
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-04-02 21:18:39 Re: Question about initdb -t