Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] Linux/Alpha patches for Postgresql 6.5.2

From: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
To: Uncle George <gatgul(at)voicenet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Linux/Alpha patches for Postgresql 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-21 00:18:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Uncle George wrote:

> Not its not. It is the 'cost' of the 'parsed' branch trees that are
> causing the final display to be slightly different. If one were to
> change the size of an 'internal' 'C struct' to be the same size of an
> 'i386' 'C struct' then the results are the same ( or at least make the
> sizeof() values the same ) then the results would be the same.
> as for the differences in the 'off by a small fraction' is due to i386
> having 80bit float operations, and the alpha does 64bit float
> operations.  ( Both under the same ieee mandate to do the same
> algorithm) 
> gat

	Thank you for those clarifications.

|   "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain."                    |
|                                            --- Philippians 1:21 (KJV)   |
|   Ryan Kirkpatrick  |  Boulder, Colorado  |   |

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Piotr KlabanDate: 1999-09-21 08:44:20
Subject: problem with postgresql-6.5.1-[1|2].i386.rpm
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 1999-09-20 22:35:57
Subject: PostgreSQL 6.5.2 RPMS available.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Lamar OwenDate: 1999-09-21 00:40:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]
Previous:From: Michael SimmsDate: 1999-09-20 23:20:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group