From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Kelvin SIN <ksin(at)students(dot)cs(dot)mu(dot)oz(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql JDBC driver compliance |
Date: | 1998-08-05 17:30:56 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980805182328.13326M-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Kelvin SIN wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> According to the JDBC documentation from java.sun.com, a JDBC driver is
> JDBC compliant if it is SQL 92 complaint and passes the JDBC compliance
> test. I think Postgresql is a subset of SQL92, but is it still JDBC
> compliant?
It isn't yet for two reasons:
1) CallableStatement is not implemented at all yet
2) I'm not sure if it would be compliant as we only support a subset of
SQL92.
> I am working in a client server project that connects to
> postgresql and I need to find out how many of the JDBC APIs can be used,
> especially the getCursor() method under the Connection class. Thanks.
Currently getCursor() simply returns the string passed to the Connection
by the setCursor() method.
I think that (in JDBC) cursors need looking into.
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-08-05 17:45:12 | Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC:postgresql and Symantec Visual Cafe |
Previous Message | Matthew Hagerty | 1998-08-05 17:16:20 | postgresODBC and Symantec dbAnywhere/Visual Cafe, broken? |