I compiled and I installed successful the xid operator, I tried it
using: SELECT * FROM foo WHERE xmin = {some_constant}
and it works.
I download psqlodbc.dll v06.03.0244, I tried it but seems that doesn't work yet.
Did I forget something ?
Thanks in any way for your work David.
I'm going for vaccations next week, so forgive me if I don't replay for a week.
Jose'
On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, David Hartwig wrote:
> > > 2) You have to create an '=' operator for the xid type on the postgres side since one
> Here is is what you will need. I hope you know how to compile a shared lib for your
> platform. This can be an adventure if you have not done it before. You will have to
> adjust the path in the CREATE FUNCTION statement to your lib dir. Run the SQL after you
> compile and install the shared lib. To test, do something like:
>
> SELECT * FROM foo WHERE xmin = {some_constant}
>
> I plan to submit a patch to make this a part of the 6.4 base release.
>
>
>
>
> Jose' Soares Da Silva wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Byron Nikolaidis wrote:
> >
> > > Jose',
> > >
> > > I got row versioning working with the "xmin" field. Since it is a system column, and
> > > automatically updates, you would not need triggers all over the place on every table.
> > > I made it a datasource option called "Row Versioning".
> > >
> > > It works well with Access except for two minor caveats:
> > >
> > > 1) The driver has to report the 'xmin' field in SQLColumns. There is no way around
> > > that I can see. Access, thus displays it. Users can of course hide the column if they
> > > hate looking at it. And Access won't let you type into this field which is good.
> > >
> > > 2) You have to create an '=' operator for the xid type on the postgres side since one
> > > does not already exist. I have the code to do it if you are interested (it is very
> > > small). For 6.4, we would make sure this operator is added.
> > >
> > Ok Byron, I think this is a good solution.
> > In this way we don't need to add a TIMESTAMP to every table there's already a
> > XMIN present.
> > In any way, what's happen with TIMESTAMPs ? May we have Access recognize it as
> > DATETIME or we can't because Access beleaves that's a ROWVER ?
> > I would like to try it. Please Byron may you send me the code for '=' operator
> > for xid type.
> > Jose'
>