| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Query caching |
| Date: | 2000-11-02 14:38:14 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1001102153228.4496A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> > compile time option
> > is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch
> > in the contrib
> > tree. And if it until not good tested not dirty with this main tree...
> >
> > Ok, I next week prepare it...
>
> One thing that worries me though is, that it extends the sql language,
> and there has been no discussion about the chosen syntax.
>
> Imho the standard embedded SQL syntax (prepare ...) could be a
> starting point.
Yes, you are right... my PREPARE/EXECUTE is not too much ready to SQL92,
I some old letter I speculate about "SAVE/EXECUTE PLAN" instead
PREPARE/EXECUTE. But don't forget, it will *experimental* patch... we can
change it in future ..etc.
Karel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-11-02 15:28:21 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
| Previous Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-11-02 13:39:29 | DROP hangup... |