Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] backend -> interface communication

From: Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Hankin <hankin(at)dunno(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backend -> interface communication
Date: 1998-03-03 06:36:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.95.980303063554.21523A-100000@maidast (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Hankin wrote:

> how is a notice sent from the backend?
> does it send a Nxxxxx\n  or a VNxxxxx\n ??
> Whenever I do a lo_close() I get a NOTICE: tablerelease: no lock found.
> and PQfn() tries to read a VNxxxxx\n  when the backend sends a Nxxxxx\n

This last bit sounds familiar. I thought it was fixed a long time ago
(after I noticed it while implementing PQfn in Java)

Peter T Mount  petermount(at)earthling(dot)net or pmount(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Main Homepage:
Work Homepage: Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: HankinDate: 1998-03-03 07:26:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backend -> interface communication
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-03-03 05:58:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group