| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: pgbench duration option | 
| Date: | 2008-08-18 20:25:30 | 
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0808181538190.867@westnet.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> the seldom-used log-each-transaction option, which pretty obviously
>  is a drag on performance anyway
I always recommend that people run with log each transaction turned on, 
beause it's the only way to gather useful latency information.  I think 
runs that measure TPS without even considering that are much less useful. 
The fact that it's seldom used is something I consider a problem with 
pgbench.
> I repeat my concern that transaction rates measured with this patch will
> be significantly different from those seen with the old code
Last time I tried to quantify the overhead of logging with timestamps on I 
couldn't even measure its impact, it was lower than the usual pgbench 
noise.  That was on Linux.  Do you have a suggestion for a platform that 
it's a problem on that I might be able to use?  I'd like to do some 
measurements.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-08-18 20:36:30 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-18 20:22:56 | Re: Extending varlena |