Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-30 22:11:20
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0805301809050.9617@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 31 May 2008, Gurjeet Singh wrote:

>> Not if you use pg_clearxlogtail
>
> This means we need to modify pg_standby to not check for filesize when
> reading XLogs.

No, the idea is that you run the segments through pg_clearxlogtail | gzip,
which then compresses lightly used segments massively because all the
unused bytes are 0. File comes out the same size at the other side, but
you didn't ship a full 16MB if there was only a few KB used.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2008-05-30 22:42:20 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2008-05-30 21:18:51 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2008-05-30 22:42:20 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2008-05-30 21:52:39 Re: Shouldn't Natural JOINs Follow FK Constraints?