Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL Certification

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, cert(at)lists(dot)postgresqlcertification(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date: 2008-02-04 01:32:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:

> I think a company could be "Certified" when it hires a certain number of
> PostgreSQL "certified" individuals.
> All the point is determining how much...

If you just force the program to be open this issue largely resolves 
itself.  Companies that want to advertise their certification should have 
to list their certified members.  Leave it up to the buyer as to whether 
they have enough of them, why should the certification authority be 
needlessly complicated by worrying about this sort of thing?

The logical leap from there is to not certify companies except indirectly 
via this mechanism, which solves the whole stack of logistics problems 
that would otherwise come from trying to figure out just what a company 
certification even means.  Saying "you can list certification for a 
company only in the context of listing your certified workers" makes the 
issue go away.

* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com Baltimore, MD

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: eleinDate: 2008-02-04 01:36:12
Subject: Re: New Shipment of Elephant Pins
Previous:From: Jean-Paul ArgudoDate: 2008-02-04 00:14:23
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Certification

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: brianDate: 2008-02-04 01:32:51
Subject: Re: Function returning subset of columns from table (return type)
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2008-02-04 00:51:55
Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group