Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool
Date: 2007-06-23 19:28:17
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0706231522460.1349@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-performance

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Campbell, Lance wrote:

> I have a PostgreSQL database that runs on a dedicated server. The
> server has 24Gig of memory. What would be the max size I would ever
> want to set the shared_buffers to if I where to relying on the OS for
> disk caching approach? It seems that no matter how big your dedicated
> server is there would be a top limit to the size of shared_buffers.

It's impossible to say exactly what would work optimally in this sort of
situation. The normal range is 25-50% of total memory, but there's no
hard reason for that balance; for all we know your apps might work best
with 20GB in shared_buffers and only a relatively small 4GB left over for
the rest of the OS to use. Push it way up and and see what you get.

This is part of why the idea of an "advanced" mode for this tool is
suspect. Advanced tuning usually requires benchmarking with as close to
real application data as you can get in order to make good forward
progress.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2007-06-26 00:19:01 Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool
Previous Message David Gardner 2007-06-23 00:48:25 proposed FAQ entry

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-06-23 19:32:45 Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-06-22 22:24:07 Re: Slow join query