| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql list Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Fragmentation of WAL files | 
| Date: | 2007-04-27 04:50:55 | 
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0704270019060.8684@westnet.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bill Moran wrote:
> I've seen marketing material that claims that modern NTFS doesn't suffer 
> performance problems from fragmentation.
You're only reading half of the marketing material then.  For a balanced 
picture, read the stuff generated by the companies that sell defragmenting 
tools.  A good one to start with is 
http://files.diskeeper.com/pdf/HowFileFragmentationOccursonWindowsXP.pdf
Going back to the Jim's original question, they suggest a Microsoft paper 
that talks about how the defrag report can be misleading in respect to 
open files.  See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/228198
Also, some of the most interesting details they gloss over are specific to 
which version of Windows you're using; the reference guide to the subject 
of how NTFS decides how much space to pre-allocate at a time is available 
at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/841551 (ZIP file wrapped into EXE, 
yuck!)
If you compare them, you can see that the approach they're using in NTFS 
has evolved to become more like that used by a good UNIX filesystem over 
time.  I think your typical UNIX still has a healthy lead in this area, 
but the difference isn't as big as it used to be.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2007-04-27 06:07:38 | Re: index structure for 114-dimension vector | 
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2007-04-27 04:46:21 | Re: Simple query, 10 million records...MySQL ten times faster |