Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGResultSetMetaData

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: leo <usenet(at)workfile(dot)de>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGResultSetMetaData
Date: 2005-01-24 08:07:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> (Kris, any reason why PGResultSetMetadata does not extend 
> ResultSetMetadata?)

Never really thought about it.  Note that PGStatement and PGConnection
don't extend the java.sql versions, instead there are BaseXXX versions
that extend the pg and java.sql versions that the Abstract classes
implement.  I'm confused as to how this actually works because the
Abstract classes don't implement the full java.sql interface.  Then the 
real JdbcX classes also claim to implement the java.sql inteface and 
actually do.

In any case what we have now is a little confusing internally, but 
externally it is consistent.

Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Daniele BufariniDate: 2005-01-24 08:53:44
Subject: Re: [S] Re: Problems with non scrollable cursors
Previous:From: leoDate: 2005-01-23 21:30:47
Subject: Re: PGResultSetMetaData

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group