On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > At 18:34 4/08/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > >> Philip Warner writes:
> > >>
> > >> > Is there any reason that a security model does not exist for psql that
> > >> > allows Unix user 'fred' to log in as PG user 'fred' with no password etc,
> > >> > but any user trying to log on as someone other than themselves has to
> > >> > provide a password?
> > >>
> > >> Short of someone sitting down and making it happen I don't see any. You'd
> > >> only need to implement some sort of fall-through in `pg_hba.conf', which
> > >> in my estimate can't be exceedingly hard.
> > >
> > >How do you know Fred is Fred without a password?
> > >
> > The idea was to apply only on the matchine on which the postmaster runs;
> > then ideally you get the username of the client process. It's kind of like
> > IDENT, except it works only for local connections, and asks for passwords
> > for non-local connections.
> I am not aware of any way to determine the PID at the other end of a
> unix domain socket.
You actually don't need the PID on the other end, what you are interested
are the credentials of a process on the other end.
Unfortunately, every OS implemented it in very different way. Linux has
SO_PEERCREDS option, solaris has doors, xBSD have SCM_CREDS or LOCAL_CREDS
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-08-05 04:05:20|
|Subject: Quoting fun|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-08-05 03:13:23|
|Subject: Re: Security choices...|