| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Imperfect solutions |
| Date: | 2001-06-05 15:38:08 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0106050837140.9447-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Just thought you might like to add
> > >
> > > * ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY
> > > * ALTER TABLE ADD UNIQUE
> >
> > And what
> >
> > ALTER TABLE DROP PRIMARY KEY
> > ALTER TABLE DROP UNIQUE
> >
> > BTW, it's a little cosmetic feature if we have CREATE/DROP INDEX :-)
>
> Those two points are already mentioned - I have another 90% patch ready to
> go that will add that functionality as well...
As a question, are you doing anything to handle dropping referenced unique
constraints or are we just waiting on that until a referencing system
is built?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-05 16:46:12 | Re: Strange query plan |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-06-05 15:37:23 | Re: Multiprocessor performance |