| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | dave(at)turbocat(dot)de, ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long |
| Date: | 1999-01-07 03:08:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9901062307560.417-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Start at the top of the table, go to the first 'blank' section (a deleted
> > record)...find the next good record that will fit in the space, move it
> > there...clear out the old space, etc...
> >
> > if dba issues a 'vacuum', lock the table and do all records at once, but
> > otherwise try and vacuum the table live...
> >
> > With the new MVCC serialization, this concept should be less intrusive on
> > readers, no?
>
> Wish I knew the answer. I can guess, but that isn't going to help.
Guess == throwing in ideas, even if they are incorrect...the way I
figure it, I through out alot of guesses...some of them spark ideas in
others and we see some really neat ideas come out of it :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-07 03:53:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-07 02:50:04 | Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-07 03:53:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-07 02:36:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long |