Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here
Date: 1998-10-30 20:16:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > > On Sun, 30 Aug 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> So I think I have to vote in favor of leaving the socket where it is.
> > 
> > > Let me put my vote in...: $PGSQLHOME/run/{,}
> > > Screw backwards compatibility...v6.5 becomes v7.0 *shrug*
> > 
> > Catching up on back email, Marc?
> > 
> > I think the end consensus of that thread was that we should move the
> > socket file to someplace safer than /tmp (exactly where being a
> > configure-time choice), *and* optionally put a softlink to it in /tmp
> > for backwards compatibility with old clients.  Use of the /tmp link
> > would be deprecated because of possible security risks, but it could
> > continue to work for as long as a particular installation needed to
> > keep that option enabled.
> Just a reminder that if you move it, all clients must know the new
> location, or somehow the location must be accessable by the clients.

	Which is only relevant if using Unix-domain sockets...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-10-30 21:38:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HPUX 10.01 build issues and solutions.
Previous:From: mschoutDate: 1998-10-30 20:01:35
Subject: HPUX 10.01 build issues and solutions.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group