Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again
Date: 1998-10-28 02:12:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> Someone checked in code that assumes vsnprintf() exists.
> Should be cool, we have an emulation right?  Well, no.
> configure sets up to build port/snprintf.c if snprintf()
> doesn't exist.  HPUX, for one, has that but not vsnprintf.
> I guess the right fix is for configure to check for *both*
> snprintf and vsnprintf --- anyone see a problem with that?
	After v6.4 is released, sounds great to me...before, I send guys
around to break fingers :)

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: TaralDate: 1998-10-28 02:22:06
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: Configure problem, redux (was Re: TCL installationtroubles)
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-10-28 02:11:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group