RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

From: "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date: 2021-04-07 05:22:22
Message-ID: OSBPR01MB48888D0BB60228D3872DBC50ED759@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 7:50 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2021/04/07 5:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> >> Thanks! So I pushed the patch.
> >
> > Seems like the test case added by this commit is not working on
> > Windows.
>
> Thanks for the report! My analysis is [1], and I pushed the proposed patch.
>
> [1]
> https://postgr.es/m/3cc3909d-f779-7a74-c201-f1f7f62c7497@oss.nttdata.co
> m
Fujii-san, Tom,
thank you so much for your quick analysis and modification.
I appreciate those.

Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robins Tharakan 2021-04-07 05:43:43 buildfarm instance bichir stuck
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-07 05:20:50 Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?