RE: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication

From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication
Date: 2026-02-28 08:40:31
Message-ID: OS9PR01MB1691377CDB1468CDC9820BBEB9470A@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday, February 27, 2026 7:07 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Few comments:
> =============
> 1.
> + oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(SequenceSyncContext);
>
> - initStringInfo(&app_name);
> - appendStringInfo(&app_name, "pg_%u_sequence_sync_" UINT64_FORMAT,
> - MySubscription->oid, GetSystemIdentifier());
> + /* Process sequences */
> + sequence_copied = copy_sequences(conn, seqinfos);
>
> - /*
> - * Establish the connection to the publisher for sequence synchronization.
> - */
> - LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn =
> - walrcv_connect(MySubscription->conninfo, true, true,
> - must_use_password,
> - app_name.data, &err);
> - if (LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn == NULL)
> - ereport(ERROR,
> - errcode(ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE),
> - errmsg("sequencesync worker for subscription \"%s\" could not connect to
> the publisher: %s",
> - MySubscription->name, err));
> -
> - pfree(app_name.data);
> -
> - copy_sequences(LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn);
> + MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldctx);
>
> It is better to switch to SequenceSyncContext at the caller of
> LogicalRepSyncSequences similar to what we are doing for
> ApplyMessageContext.

Agreed. I changed as suggested.

>
> 2.
> @@ -4221,6 +4221,7 @@ LogicalRepApplyLoop(XLogRecPtr last_received)
> ProcessConfigFile(PGC_SIGHUP);
> }
>
> +
> if (rc & WL_TIMEOUT)
>
> Spurious line addition.
>
> 3. Apart from above, the attached patch contains comments and cosmetic
> changes.

Thanks for the patch, I have merged them into 0001.

Here is the V8 patch set addressing the previous review comments:

- For 0001, I noticed that the GetSequence() function added in the patch
fetches the local sequence value without any privilege check. This
allows the worker to read sequence data even without proper SELECT
privilege, which seems unsafe. I've added a SELECT privilege check
before fetching the sequence value. Additionally, I've updated several
comments, made cosmetic changes, commit message update, and run
pgindent on all patches.

- 0002 includes the changes to synchronize sequences directly in the
REFRESH SEQUENCES command

Best Regards,
Hou zj

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Support-automatic-sequence-replication.patch application/octet-stream 41.3 KB
v8-0002-Synchronize-sequences-directly-in-REFRESH-SEQUENC.patch application/octet-stream 17.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Madhav Madhusoodanan 2026-02-28 08:42:16 Re: [WiP] B-tree page merge during vacuum to reduce index bloat
Previous Message James Pang 2026-02-28 08:26:05 Re: Primary and standby setting cross-checks