Re: NOT NULL

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NOT NULL
Date: 2003-10-30 01:33:01
Message-ID: FFF0122F-0A78-11D8-B4BC-0003931A964A@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: sfpug

On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 05:27 PM, elein wrote:

> Well, you'll run into problems if there are
> any nulls hanging around int the column.

Right, duh. But I can check for that.

> What is the problem with alter table? Or
> are you not at that version?

I need to support back to 7.1, at least in theory. And besides, I don't
think that alter table allows you to add NOT NULLs yet.

Regards,

David

--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
david(at)kineticode(dot)com ICQ: 15726394
http://www.kineticode.com/ Yahoo!: dew7e
Jabber: Theory(at)jabber(dot)org
Kineticode. Setting knowledge in motion.[sm]

In response to

Responses

Browse sfpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2003-10-30 03:55:02 Re: NOT NULL
Previous Message elein 2003-10-30 01:27:58 Re: NOT NULL