Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE
Date: 2026-06-17 17:39:04
Message-ID: F5F7F43D-A140-4596-98C5-94BD251BBC8C@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> On 3 Jun 2026, at 04:03, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
>
> even an unused read should
> correctly abort for consistency

Yes, unused read is still a read. That makes sense.

Let's work towards fixes. I agree with your idea about introducing helpers
and tracking all cases where we need to DooM. Would you like to propose a
next patch version where you fix all know cases?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-06-17 19:19:03 Re: Fw:Re: Fw: gbt_var_consistent in contrib/btree_gist/btree_utils_var.c has internal-node type confusion on the <> strategy, bypassing exclusion constraints
Previous Message Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 2026-06-17 17:03:21 Re: BUG #19519: REPACK can fail due to missing chunk for toast value