Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs
Date: 2024-01-26 18:56:23
Message-ID: F5F4F5A4-8281-483C-8BD3-DC3CD3315BA1@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 25, 2024, at 11:03, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I changed the preceding para to say "... check expressions are
> required in ...", which I thought was sufficient to cover that.
> Also, the tabular description of the operator tells you not to do it.

Yeah, that’s good. I was perhaps leaning into being over-explicit after it took me a while to even figure out that there was a difference, let alone where matters.

>> What do you think of also dropping the article from all the references to “the strict mode” or “the lax mode”, to make them “strict mode” and “lax mode”, respectively?
>
> Certainly most of 'em don't need it. I'll make it so.

Nice, thanks!

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-01-26 19:23:29 Re: psql: add \create_function command
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2024-01-26 18:51:48 Re: psql: add \create_function command