From: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
Cc: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New acinclude.m4 |
Date: | 2005-05-19 21:12:25 |
Message-ID: | F2401280-20F2-4EAC-A0F6-BAFF7680C6B3@fmonkey.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On May 19, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> What I'm trying to say is this:
> I've a dynamic only build. So, wx-config --libs is ok. wx-config
> --static --libs gives an error.
> According to what I understand from the wx-config --help output is:
> if I had both built and would like to get informations concerning the
> static wxWid libs, then I'd need to pass --static to wx-config. Right?
Yes. The --static flag is only useful in the case where a user has
both a static and dynamic build of wxWidgets in the same tree.
>
> yup, _I HATE STATIC BUILDS TOO_ :)) But, it seems that at least for
> Florian this is important. The latest patch I sent just does two
> things:
> a) force static parameters of wxWid, just in case the wx-config --libs
> would not give the _static_ lib informations when both shared and
> static
> are installed on the system.
Yes, your patch would add support for those people with both build
types.
> b) re-introduce the pg_static_build=yes variable which is later
> interpreted just as in previous versions because the old code is still
> there.
There are no references to pg_static_build in acinclude any more.
Well, okay there's one, but it doesn't do anything because
pg_static_build isn't set anywhere (sans your patch, of course).
Your patch is fine, just know that it terms of statically linking
pgAdmin3 as a whole it does nothing. It only helps any user with
both a dynamic and static wx select the one they want.
ahp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2005-05-19 21:20:49 | Re: New acinclude.m4 |
Previous Message | Raphaël Enrici | 2005-05-19 20:54:37 | Re: New acinclude.m4 |