RE: [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive lis t of Newbie qu

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: ocie(at)paracel(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive lis t of Newbie qu
Date: 1998-03-17 02:14:09
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F18ECB5@dal_cps.cpsgroup.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Looks sort of like our procedural language, except that instead of
> having a "pool" of functions, functions can be "member functions" of a
> class. In order to do this "all the way", it seems like we will need
> all instances to appear in their parent classes -- Select
> people.average_age() should hit all instances of people, even those
> that have been subclassed into teachers, police, lawyers, etc.
>
> Ocie Mitchell
Agreed. I meant member functions. But I wouldn't take away the global
pool of functions either. This satisfies my since of OOP.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-03-17 02:35:32 Re: [HACKERS] datetime default 'now' broken?
Previous Message ocie 1998-03-17 01:58:56 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive list of Newbie qu