| From: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Questions Mailing List <pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive list of Newbie qu estion |
| Date: | 1998-03-17 01:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F18ECB1@dal_cps.cpsgroup.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Is this possible? Or is it already being done?
<a lot snipped>
> > > How do you assign function to your objects?
<snip>
> I don't know if tying functions to classes has been added
> to the TO-DO list. You may want to post to the hacker list and
> suggest
> it.
>
Access to the function would then be gained by calling them through the
class. (i.e. select EMP.totalPeople();, or update CORPEMP set
CORPEMP.totals = DIVEMP.totalPeople();)
Just an OO thought. (*ahhhh* It's that concurrency/data-hiding/coupling
thing again.)
Then one could disallow select/update on a table but all execute on
specific functions. I do realize that this can be accomplished through
triggers, but this has other potentials...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ocie | 1998-03-17 01:45:15 | Unique index using hash? |
| Previous Message | David Gould | 1998-03-16 23:38:10 | Re: [HACKERS] spin locks |