From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin2 Japanese display |
Date: | 2002-02-26 15:26:45 |
Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJIEDBGPAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp]
> >
> > Dave Page wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi, will the multibyte version work OK with Latin encodings? I
> > > suppose what I'm asking is, should we distribute the
> > multibyte version
> > > by default or would it break things for people that are not using
> > > multibyte encodings?
> >
> > According to Eiji Tokuya who introduced the multibyte
> > support, the multibyte version has no problem with single
> > byte encodings.
>
> Would you have any objections if we only distributed that version from now
> on then?
No.
> BTW, I assume it would compile *properly* on a non-multibyte system... or
> not?
It would compile properly but the binary may be ineffective unless it
is compiled on a multibyte system strangely.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-26 15:35:35 | Re: pgAdmin2 Japanese display |
Previous Message | Cedar Cox | 2002-02-26 13:23:32 | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 Japanese display |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-26 15:35:35 | Re: pgAdmin2 Japanese display |
Previous Message | Cedar Cox | 2002-02-26 13:23:32 | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 Japanese display |