> On 2 Jun 2023, at 23:21, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:35:43AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> I think we should avoid the is-defined-in dance and just pull out the version >> numbers for comparisons. While it's true that LibreSSL doesn't play well with >> OpenSSL versions, they do define their own which can be checked for to >> distinguish the libraries. > > Agreed. How about tackling that in a separate patch?
Absolutely, let's keep these goalposts in place and deal with that separately.