Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2023-06-02 21:23:19
Message-ID: EE082301-F023-4A0A-82EA-F68C4D6A90A0@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 Jun 2023, at 23:21, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:35:43AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I think we should avoid the is-defined-in dance and just pull out the version
>> numbers for comparisons. While it's true that LibreSSL doesn't play well with
>> OpenSSL versions, they do define their own which can be checked for to
>> distinguish the libraries.
>
> Agreed. How about tackling that in a separate patch?

Absolutely, let's keep these goalposts in place and deal with that separately.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2023-06-02 21:26:50 Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-06-02 21:21:54 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?