RE: Timeout parameters

Hi, Tsunakawa-san, Kirk-san.

Thank you for your review.

Tsunakawa-san,
> From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki [mailto:tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com]
> The client-side tcp_user_timeout patch looks good.
Thanks, but I minorly changed that patch.
It is the declaration place of sebuf[], moving to just before where it'll become needed.

> The server-side tcp_user_timeout patch needs fixing the following:
> (1)
> + GUC_UNIT_MS | GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE
> + 12000, 0, INT_MAX,
>
> GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE should be removed because the parameter appears in
> postgresql.conf.sample.
> The default value should be 0, not 12000.
Oops, fixed!

> (2)
> Now that you've changed show_tcp_usertimeout() to use
> pq_gettcpusertimeout(), you need to modify pq_settcpusertimeout(); just immitate pq_setkeepalivesidle().
> Otherwise, SHOW would display a wrong value.
Indeed, pq_settcpusertimeout() should be modified as well.

> The socket_timeout patch needs the following fixes. Now that others
> have already tested these patches successfully, they appear committable to me.
Thank you so much for reviewing even socket_timeout patch.

> The reason why oom_error label is present is that it is used at
> multiple places to avoid repeating the same error processing code.
Understood.

> (2)
> + conn->sock = -1;
>
> Use PGINVALID_SOCKET instead of -1.
Oh, I see.

Kirk-san,
> I referred to the doc in libpq.sgml, corrected misspellings, and rephrased the
> doc a little bit as below:
Changed "stop-gap" and "mean" -> "stopgap" and "measure" respectively.
But I can't find the difference between mine and yours.
Would you please tell me if there is a difference like this depending on your rephrasing?

Best regards,
---------------------
Ryohei Nagaura