| From: | "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Evan Rempel <erempel(at)uvic(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Question about multiple slaves and Master loss. |
| Date: | 2011-12-07 18:15:17 |
| Message-ID: | EC55DC235432104F8255702A8D7344D925702286@G9W0741.americas.hpqcorp.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evan Rempel [mailto:erempel(at)uvic(dot)ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:12 PM
> To: Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)
> Cc: Chris Hoover; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org Admin
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Question about multiple slaves and Master loss.
>
> Can you have a slave of a slave?
>
> Basically set up
>
> A --> B --> C
> also
> A --> D --> E
>
> if A goes down, promote B which is protected by C
> If B goes down, D is your protection for A
> If C goes down, who cares.
>
> It takes 5 machines, but would give great protection.
>
That's called cascaded replication. It's not currently supported, but coming in 9.2 I believe.
Brad.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jkells | 2011-12-07 21:22:05 | bad block problem |
| Previous Message | Evan Rempel | 2011-12-07 18:11:51 | Re: Question about multiple slaves and Master loss. |