From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
Date: | 2011-02-02 17:09:59 |
Message-ID: | EC2504AE-D0F7-44DE-B4F4-DF8B8D156673@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Well, fair enough I suppose. Or it would be if you gave me an
> alternative that provides a simpler way to support those 3 upgrades.
I did: a naming convention with upgrade scripts that have the version number in them. You rejected it.
> Of course if that's too much for you, you can also choose to only
> support upgrades one versions at a time and provide only two scripts.
> Note also that I don't recall of any proposal on the table that would
> help with that situation, so I'm all ears.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg00296.php
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-02 17:10:59 | Re: Optimize PL/Perl function argument passing [PATCH] |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-02-02 17:03:07 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |