Re: [BUG] autovacuum may skip tables when session_authorization/role is set on database

> What is the actual
> use case for such a setting?

I don't have exact details on the use-case, bit this is not a common
use-case.

> Doesn't it risk security problems?

I cannot see how setting it on the database being more problematic than
setting it on a session level.

> I'm rather unimpressed by this proposal, first because there are
> probably ten other ways to break autovac with ill-considered settings,

There exists code in autovac that safeguard for such settings. For example,
statement_timeout, lock_timeout are disabled. There are a dozen or
more other settings that are overridden for autovac.

I see this being just another one to ensure that autovacuum always runs
as superuser.

> and second because if we do want to consider this a supported case,
> what about other background processes? They'd likely have issues
> as well.

I have not considered other background processes, but autovac is the only
one that I can think of which checks for relation permissions.

Regards,

Sami