From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does postgresql-odbc work on 64-bit platforms? |
Date: | 2005-12-15 08:53:47 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E9D3@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 15 December 2005 04:08
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [ODBC] Does postgresql-odbc work on 64-bit platforms?
>
> I just had occasion to build 08.01.0102 on an x86_64 machine, and I
> noted quite a large number of warnings about "cast from pointer to
> integer of different size" and vice versa. These are pretty scary.
> Has anyone tested recent ODBC on a 64-bit machine? Do you need more
> info/help in looking at this?
Peter is pretty much the only one who has been working on that, and that
was some months ago. I did clean up a bunch of internal inconsistencies
the other day (the ones that were reported on OSX recently iirc), but
that was just making sure that the same types were used on
internal/external API functions.
If you can help (or can find some Redhat manpower) that would be
appreciated - I certainly don't have a 64 bit box right now and am
pretty thin on time as well having committed myself to too many
projects. Again. :-(
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-15 09:02:35 | Re: Next development steps? |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2005-12-15 05:39:04 | Re: More strict bind param count checking |