From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Anoop Kumar" <anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com>, "Scot Loach" <sloach(at)sandvine(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver |
Date: | 2005-08-24 09:46:13 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9C1E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Anoop Kumar
> Sent: 24 August 2005 07:17
> To: Scot Loach
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
>
> Hi,
>
> I have committed the patch for returning SQL_NO_DATA_FOUND instead of
> SQL_SUCCESS when no rows got affected in UPDATE/DELETE. You
> may check it
> out from the CVS.
Ahh, one less item on my todo :-)
Do you intend to fix the state code problem and dead connection
detection issues reported by Scot as well?
<sob story>it would really help me if you could as I've got a bunch of
other stuff to do :-( </sob story>
:-)
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-08-24 09:49:09 | Re: "Official" version |
Previous Message | Anoop Kumar | 2005-08-24 09:25:28 | Re: ODBC Problem |