Re: Bug in ODBC driver 08.00.0004 and stored procedure

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joost Kraaijeveld" <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)askesis(dot)nl>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in ODBC driver 08.00.0004 and stored procedure
Date: 2005-02-24 21:42:43
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472B73B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: 24 February 2005 20:18
> To: Joost Kraaijeveld
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Bug in ODBC driver 08.00.0004 and stored procedure
>
> Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> > > Err, it wasn't attached :-(. Perhaps Peter can look at detecting
> > > the Windows DM as a valid alternative to iODBC/unixODBC though -
> > > he's the resident autoconf guru :-)
> >
> > Sorry about that. New trial. Maybe the file can be used as
> a starting
> > point for Peter.
>
> Perhaps we can start by determining what is wrong with the current
> setup. What happens when you do configure; make; make install?

It complains because neither unixODBC or iODBC can be found. Windows has
it's own DM of course.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message lothar.behrens 2005-02-25 07:57:22 ANN: DMF Version 0.4.2 veröffentlicht
Previous Message Joost Kraaijeveld 2005-02-24 20:54:06 Re: Bug in ODBC driver 08.00.0004 and stored procedure